Spammers, nofollow and what anchor

So that's what I mean, every one of you probably periodically rake spam in their mailboxes, and the comments. So today I went in and cleaned up about a thousand spam comments on one of his resource. Cleaned with no regrets, but I liked the anchors used there and I decided to write about this post.

As it turned out so many interested in the question: Why is spam, if the links still nofollow?.


Here it is necessary to understand what a nofollow.
This is a tag which has been adopted by the W3C in order to separate the unwanted links and links which are placed with the understanding they need. There was an innovation for a long time, just because there were thousands of spammers ' foul up ' PS index these links and really distort the issue. In contrast, they often place the webmaster link is just to send the linked resource doliku trust and weight, consciously. T. e. For example all comments by default on major blogoplatformah closed nofollow, because in a real situation where anyone can leave a link, and author of the blog can post a link in his discretion.
Nofollow PS indicates that the link closed to them, should not pass the so-called weight and trust, but in practice it is not so. Maybe the weight (PR and TIC including) such links do not pass, but still indexed by search engines. And some still have an effect, just this effect is much smaller than the usual reference. And, let's say, subject resources pass on the links nofollow more effect, and such references in the West even sell.

The most important thing that makes reference to the nofollow, it is commonplace reference weight, say biting volume. In large quantities, they also affect the issue as well as the usual reference. So spammers are trying to zaspamlivaya comments, text paintings with links to the appropriate anchor text.
And I started thinking about the anchor after me with an interval of a couple of hours were asked the question: why the references to prescribe titile and what to prescribe to the title. pictures. ?.
What I think is a good reference, and is probably at least a good reference for the logic PS?.
Link is an abstract anchor - anchor linking two points on the Web. This pointer can have any look, for example, even be a picture, or text ' here'. How to make it clear to the visitor where the link leads to go on it. To do this, and there is a tag title, which fits the description of reference.
Here is a link for an example:.
<a. title =. ' This link is to an article blah blah blah '. >Blah blah blah. </a. >
Well, at anchor is usually understood as the link text itself, which, as mentioned above can be any.
Take a look at this link in terms of SEO. In the first anchor itself contains the keyword. Blah blah blah. And the title of his duplicates, as if doubling infoormativnost links. PS happy and thinks that this is the link of the present. Blah blah blah.
That should be a link, informative. Same thing with the picture. You can ALT and Title is not filled, but then. promotion pictures. does not work. But these tags are in fact not only useful for SEO. They even help those who are sitting with a GSM modem disconnects Pictures, and provide an opportunity to sign a funny comment to at least funny pictures.